Print Print
CKS is no longer commissioned by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). NICE remains committed to providing a replacement service for CKS and is currently reviewing its options. In the meantime, although CKS content is now not being maintained, it still remains relevant and will continue to be made available. CKS content was generated under a programme of topic creation and update. To check if the topic you are viewing is current or out of date, please refer to the topic publication details by clicking on the 'How up-to-date is this topic?' link in the left hand menu on individual topic pages.

Leg ulcer - venous - Evidence
Evidence on compression therapy

Compression therapy improves healing rates for venous leg ulcers. High-compression multilayered therapy appears to be more effective than medium or low compression, but there is uncertainty over which high-compression therapy is best. Compression bandages and stockings reduce recurrence rates, but the overall evidence is limited.

  • Compression versus no compression: one systematic review (search date 2000, six randomized controlled trials [RCTs], n = 260) and one additional RCT (n = 200) showed that multilayered elastomeric high-compression bandages, short-stretch bandages, double-layered bandages, compression stockings, and Unna's boots healed more ulcers compared with no compression (dressing alone, non-compression bandages, usual care). The RCTs were considered heterogeneous, using different forms of compression in different settings and populations [Cullum et al, 2001].
  • Different high-compression regimens: one systematic review (search date 2000, three RCTs, n = 285) [Cullum et al, 2001] and two RCTs showed no overall difference in healing rates between the original 'Charing Cross' 4-layered high-compression regimen compared with other high-compression regimens (commercial kits and 2-layered system). One RCT (n = 133) found that 3-layered paste significantly increased healing rates compared with 4-layered bandages [Moffatt et al, 2003; Iglesias et al, 2004; Nelson et al, 2006].
  • Multilayered high-compression versus short-stretch bandages or Unna's boot: one systematic review (search date 2000, four small RCTs, n = 164) [Cullum et al, 2001] and three subsequent RCTs showed no significant difference in healing rates between all three therapies. Two additional RCTs suggested that 4-layered compression increased healing rates compared with short-stretch bandaging [Nelson et al, 2006]. However, overall there was no clear evidence of a difference in healing rates. It is difficult to pool data and draw conclusions, given that most of the studies reported various endpoints for healing and did not provide survival data [RCN, 2006].
  • Multilayered high-compression versus single-layered bandages: one systematic review (search date 2000, four RCTs, n = 280) [Cullum et al, 2001] found a significant increase in the proportion of people whose reference ulcers had healed with multilayered compression compared with single-layered compression (56% with multilayered versus 42% single-layered, RR 1.41, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.77) [Nelson et al, 2006].

© NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement